Crypto: Eric Trump Signs Non-Control Commitment for Future World Liberty Bank
Eric Trump has explicitly agreed not to interfere in the management of the future deposit bank of World Liberty Financial. On paper, this is a gesture of regulatory goodwill. In reality, it is a case that already carries its share of uncertainties... Between ongoing crypto lawsuits, loans reminiscent of bad memories, and criticism from all political sides.
In brief
- Eric Trump, Zak Folkman, and an Emirati investor agree to stay away from the management of the future World Liberty Financial bank.
- Justin Sun accuses World Liberty of freezing his tokens and blocking his voting rights; the case remains before a federal court.
- The OCC has already approved similar charters for Ripple, Paxos, Fidelity, and Coinbase, signaling a clear pro-crypto shift.
Eric Trump, co-founder of World Liberty Zak Folkman, and Emirati investor Hamad Khalfan Ali Matar Alshamsi have each agreed through their affiliated companies to stay away from the management decisions of the group's future federal deposit bank. The technical term is "passivity commitment," a commitment of non-control.
These agreements were made public at the moment when World Liberty has just received its preliminary approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. If the federal charter is validated, the company could internally hold the reserves of its USD1 stablecoin, which amounts to nearly $4 billion in capitalization, rather than relying on a third party for that. According to World Liberty spokesperson David Wachsman, the intention behind this maneuver is for the company to remain under federal supervision for years.
World Liberty Financial's commitment to transparency comes at a time when the company is burdened by a heavy legal case that tarnishes its image. Justin Sun, the founder of Tron and the largest external investor in the project with $75 million injected, filed a lawsuit against World Liberty in April. The company allegedly:
- Frozen all of his tokens;
- Deprived him of his governance voting rights;
- Threatened to permanently destroy his assets.
World Liberty has, of course, countered with a defamation lawsuit, accusing Justin Sun of orchestrating a smear campaign after he himself breached his contractual commitments. Both proceedings are still ongoing, and a federal judge even refused to send the Sun case to private arbitration.
Another detail fueling doubts is an investigation published in April revealing that World Liberty had deposited $5 billion of its own WLFI tokens on the Dolomite lending platform as collateral to borrow approximately $75 million in stablecoins. The process feels familiar to anyone who followed the collapse of FTX... Using one's own token as collateral to raise funds... a circular leverage scheme that several observers have deemed risky. This has led to public criticism from all sides, notably from Hunter Biden, who today denounces what he calls a blatant conflict of interest.
This World Liberty case does not play out in a vacuum, as the current Comptroller of the Currency, Jonathan Gould, seems to have made the approval of new bank charters one of his stated priorities. This marks a sharp turn from the previous administration, which was much more hesitant regarding requests from the crypto sector. Ripple, Paxos, and Fidelity Digital Assets also received similar conditional approvals in 2025. Coinbase followed earlier this year.
In other words, the climate has shifted. What was once the exception just two years ago is becoming almost the norm today for major crypto names seeking a federal bank charter. Recently, it was Donald Trump himself who hosted leaders from several crypto companies at the White House while the SEC was simultaneously finalizing a broader regulatory framework for the entire sector.
The non-control commitment signed by Eric Trump for World Liberty Financial appears on paper to meet the requirements of federal regulators. But with an ongoing lawsuit involving Justin Sun, a loan that recalls the worst hours of FTX, and family financial ties that have never been completely dissipated... The promise to remain "passive" struggles to erase the lingering questions.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Trump's Envoy, Crypto Shareholder: The Double Game of Steve Witkoff

Judge Keeps Sun's World Liberty Claims In Court

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?

Data: WLFI spent $115 million to expand the market for USD1, stablecoin scale increased by 50%, trading volume increased tenfold

WLFI repaid 25 million USD1 loans at Dolomite, and the deposit interest rate has returned to 10.43%

The Trump family's cryptocurrency project WLFI has been exposed for borrowing tens of millions of dollars through related agreements, raising questions about conflicts of interest

Insights from TOKEN2049: What Changes Are Happening in the Industry?

When Agents Learn to 'Collude': As AI Becomes Smarter, How to Define Safe Boundaries?

ESMA Gives EU Crypto Platforms Three Months to Drop Non-MiCA Stablecoins: What It Means for USDT Holders in Europe

What still works in crypto marketing in 2026 (and what doesn’t)

Trump's Tax Cuts and Strategic Reserve Release Fail to Curb Oil Prices; Energy Price Pressure Before Midterm Elections Ultimately Depends on Middle East Situation

Is AI Breaking the Mathematical Fortress? Is the 'Mathematical Apocalypse' of Cryptocurrency Just a False Alarm?

Sha Ai Lun Talks to Sun Yuchen: How Can Young People Seize Opportunities in the AI Era?

AI agents can pay for your shopping. Who gets your money back?

Kevin O'Leary's Latest Interview: The Next Stop for AI is Not Models, But Energy

Florida imposes new limits for using cryptocurrency ATMs ranging from $2,000 to $10,000

Bitcoin and Quantum Risk: This Study Shows Which Exchanges Are Most Exposed

Polkadot Launches Stablecoin 'dotUSD' Under DAO Governance with USDT Issuance and US Treasury Seed Funding

Debt in Pesos: Market Fears a New 'Wall' of Maturities Every Three Months

Strategy's $150 million-a-day STRC market has a hidden dependency on its own buybacks

Crypto, Starting to Doubt the Narrative

Did the US Government Sell Bitcoin? What the 12,267 BTC Transfer Shows and What On-Chain Data Cannot Prove
No sale has been confirmed. On October 8, 2026, US government-linked wallets moved 12,267 BTC, worth about $1.01 billion, out of a wallet holding funds seized in the 2016 Bitfinex hack, to new unlabeled addresses with no exchange deposit recorded. On-chain data shows movement, not intent, and no US agency has explained the transfers.

National Tax Agency Discusses Next-Generation System "KSK2" and Tax Investigations on Cryptocurrency Assets

Why Bitcoin Could Drop Below $80,000 After Another Failed Bounce

Circle Partners with Tereina to Integrate USDC and EURC into SAP Enterprise Payments

Hedge Funds Forced to Sell to Cut Losses, U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield May Break 6%

Q3 2026 Earnings Preview: Why Strong Results May Not Lift Stocks & How to Predict Stock Moves with WEEX

Bitcoin Price Slips to a Three-Week Low Near $81,000: Can $80,000 Hold After Three Rejections at $87K?
The Bitcoin price briefly fell below $81,000 on October 9, 2026, its lowest level in nearly three weeks, after repeated failures near $87,000. A bond selloff, weaker tech stocks, spot ETF outflows and a long liquidation wave all added pressure. The $80,000 area is now the key support, while $83,000 is the first level bulls need to reclaim.

Who Will Share the Profits of Cross-Border Remittances in the Stablecoin Era?








