Crypto: LIBRA and M3M3, U.S. Justice Dismisses Class Action
End of procedural game in Manhattan. Federal Judge Jennifer L. Rochon has definitively dismissed the class action filed against several alleged promoters of the memecoins $LIBRA and $M3M3. In an 81-page ruling issued on September 29, the magistrate rejected all claims and denied a further amendment to the complaint, deemed unnecessary.
However, this judicial victory does not constitute a validation of the launches in question. The court did not determine whether the alleged manipulations actually took place. It concluded that the plaintiffs had not properly established the legal grounds to pursue the defendants in New York.
Key Points
- All claims against Hayden Davis, his family, Kelsier Ventures, Benjamin Chow, and Meteora were dismissed.
- Six to seven months of token launches are insufficient to demonstrate the continuity required by the RICO Act.
- Meteora was not recognized as an association that could be sued.
- The decision does not resolve the reality of the manipulation accusations surrounding $LIBRA and $M3M3.
LIBRA and M3M3: Six Months Are Not Enough to Constitute a RICO Enterprise
Omar Hurlock and Anuj Mehta had initiated the action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The former claimed to have lost about $19,000 on $M3M3, launched in December 2024. The latter had purchased $LIBRA on the day of its launch in February 2025, following the message << Viva La Libertad >> posted by Argentine President Javier Milei.
The complaint accused the defendants of having prepared the insiders' wallets, controlled liquidity, artificially inflated prices, and then sold their positions before a collapse exceeding 90%. These accusations were not examined on the merits.
The plaintiffs notably invoked the RICO Act, a federal law designed to prosecute organizations engaged in repeated criminal activity. To use it, they had to demonstrate the existence of a structured enterprise and a sufficiently continuous scheme over time.
However, the described period spanned approximately six months, from October 2024 to March 2025. The proposal to add $MELANIA, $ENRON, and $TRUST to a new version of the complaint would have only extended this period to seven months. The judge deemed this duration insufficient to establish a closed continuity.
Open continuity also fails. The plaintiffs' own assertions described Kelsier and Meteora as primarily legitimate activities, while the alleged electronic fraud did not demonstrate a lasting threat of criminality. Without a racketeering scheme, the RICO claims and the associated conspiracy vanish.
Social media reacted to the news in a mixed manner -- Source: X Account
Meteora Is Not a "Team" That Can Be Sued
The complaint presented Meteora as an unincorporated association comprising several participants. Dynamic Labs intervened to argue that Meteora referred to software and not an autonomous organization.
The judge noted that the plaintiffs had not identified any specific members, leaders, governance rules, or mutual consent around a common goal. Simply labeling a protocol or its contributors as a << team >> is therefore insufficient to create an entity that can be sued.
The fraud claims against Benjamin Chow were also dismissed. Potential gains do not, by themselves, demonstrate fraudulent intent. His message posted after the crash, in which he acknowledged allowing Hayden Davis to act, did not further prove that he intended to deceive buyers from the launch.
Finally, the removal of the RICO aspect deprived the court of the argument that allowed it to exercise national jurisdiction over Kelsier Ventures and the Davis family. The connections presented with the State of New York were not sufficient to maintain the lawsuits.
A temporary freeze of $57.65 million in USDC had been ordered in 2025, before being lifted after the denial of a preliminary injunction. The proceedings opened in Argentina remain separate from this U.S. case. Javier Milei, whose publication had helped propel $LIBRA, was not a defendant in New York.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

US Court Dismisses LIBRA and M3M3 Class Action Lawsuit, Plaintiffs Fail to Meet Legal Requirements

Zcash Pushes for Quantum-Resistant Payment Implementation by January Next Year

OJK Prepares New Crypto Trading System in Indonesia, Will the Role of Exchanges Change? - Fintech World

Endeavor Catalyst Raises $320 Million to Invest in Startups Outside Silicon Valley

IPCA Above the Target Ceiling: What Changes for Interest Rates and Investments

Behind the Boom of Stock Tokenization: Who is Making Money and Who is Being Used?

Ondo Private Markets Launches Tokenized Pre-IPO AI Notes: How They Work, Who Can Buy, and Why They Are Not Shares

Insights from TOKEN2049: What Changes Are Happening in the Industry?

Samsung Wallet Adds USDC on Solana for 82 Million US Galaxy Devices: What Launches in October and What Remains Unconfirmed

When Agents Learn to 'Collude': As AI Becomes Smarter, How to Define Safe Boundaries?

ESMA Gives EU Crypto Platforms Three Months to Drop Non-MiCA Stablecoins: What It Means for USDT Holders in Europe

What still works in crypto marketing in 2026 (and what doesn’t)

Trump's Tax Cuts and Strategic Reserve Release Fail to Curb Oil Prices; Energy Price Pressure Before Midterm Elections Ultimately Depends on Middle East Situation

Is AI Breaking the Mathematical Fortress? Is the 'Mathematical Apocalypse' of Cryptocurrency Just a False Alarm?

Sha Ai Lun Talks to Sun Yuchen: How Can Young People Seize Opportunities in the AI Era?

AI agents can pay for your shopping. Who gets your money back?

Kevin O'Leary's Latest Interview: The Next Stop for AI is Not Models, But Energy

Florida imposes new limits for using cryptocurrency ATMs ranging from $2,000 to $10,000

Bitcoin and Quantum Risk: This Study Shows Which Exchanges Are Most Exposed

Polkadot Launches Stablecoin 'dotUSD' Under DAO Governance with USDT Issuance and US Treasury Seed Funding

PLTR Stock Near $200: Can Palantir Break Its Recent High After Goldman's $230 Target and a $250 Call?
PLTR stock climbed about 2% to roughly $198 to $199 on October 8, 2026, after Goldman Sachs upgraded Palantir to Buy with a $230 target. The all-time high sits near $207, and the valuation is steep. This article covers what the upgrade says, where the price levels are and what could stop a breakout.

Debt in Pesos: Market Fears a New 'Wall' of Maturities Every Three Months

Strategy's $150 million-a-day STRC market has a hidden dependency on its own buybacks

Crypto, Starting to Doubt the Narrative

Did the US Government Sell Bitcoin? What the 12,267 BTC Transfer Shows and What On-Chain Data Cannot Prove
No sale has been confirmed. On October 8, 2026, US government-linked wallets moved 12,267 BTC, worth about $1.01 billion, out of a wallet holding funds seized in the 2016 Bitfinex hack, to new unlabeled addresses with no exchange deposit recorded. On-chain data shows movement, not intent, and no US agency has explained the transfers.

National Tax Agency Discusses Next-Generation System "KSK2" and Tax Investigations on Cryptocurrency Assets

Why Bitcoin Could Drop Below $80,000 After Another Failed Bounce

Circle Partners with Tereina to Integrate USDC and EURC into SAP Enterprise Payments

Hedge Funds Forced to Sell to Cut Losses, U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield May Break 6%






