National Assembly Budget Office: "Korean Won Stablecoin Could Save Up to 5 Trillion Won in Payment Costs... Regulation of Reserve Assets is Necessary"
Cost Savings of Up to 5 Trillion Won by Replacing Card Payments
The National Assembly Budget Office has analyzed that if a Korean won-based stablecoin replaces credit card payments, it could reduce annual payment transaction costs by over 5 trillion won.
However, it warned that the outflow of bank deposits and the risk of large-scale redemptions could lead to instability in the financial market, suggesting that regulatory measures for reserve assets should be established alongside the introduction of the Korean won stablecoin.
In its economic issue analysis report No. 109 titled "Impact and Implications of Stablecoins on the Financial Market," published on the 8th, the National Assembly Budget Office analyzed the economic benefits and financial market impacts of introducing a Korean won stablecoin and proposed related legislative directions.
According to the report, the global market capitalization of stablecoins grew to approximately $312.3 billion as of July. Among these, dollar-based stablecoins account for 98.8% of the total, and their usage has expanded from digital asset trading and exchange liquidity management to international remittances, business-to-business (B2B) payments, and peer-to-peer (P2P) transfers.
In South Korea, a Korean won-based stablecoin has not yet been introduced, and transactions are primarily conducted using dollar-based stablecoins. Discussions are ongoing in the National Assembly regarding the establishment of a basic law that includes the issuance, distribution, and regulation of digital assets, including stablecoins. Currently, nine bills related to stablecoins have been proposed in the National Assembly.
Key issues include issuance qualifications and licensing requirements, reserve asset and capital standards, user protection and information disclosure obligations, and the division of roles among supervisory agencies. The discussion also includes whether to allow interest and compensation for holders and how to regulate stablecoins issued abroad within the country.
Korean Won Stablecoin Could Save Up to 5 Trillion Won in Payment Costs
The National Assembly Budget Office analyzed that if a Korean won stablecoin partially replaces existing credit card payments, it could reduce payment transaction costs for merchants. Based on last year's domestic payment card usage, the annual cost savings effect is estimated to be between 370 billion won and 5.15 trillion won.
The scale of savings varies depending on the fee rates of cards and stablecoins, as well as the replacement rate of credit card payments. In a baseline scenario applying a card fee rate of 1.3% and a stablecoin fee rate of 0.3%, it is estimated that replacing 5% of credit card payments could save 610 billion won, 10% could save 1.23 trillion won, and 30% could save 3.68 trillion won.
In an optimistic scenario applying a card fee rate of 1.5% and a stablecoin fee rate of 0.1%, the savings for a 30% replacement rate increased to 5.15 trillion won.
This cost reduction lowers the fee burden for merchants, but the report explains that it could act as a factor for reduced fee revenue for card companies.
"Risks of Bank Deposit Outflow and Coin Runs Must Be Considered"
The analysis also pointed out that the introduction of a Korean won stablecoin does not only bring benefits. The report evaluated cross-border remittances and trade payment cost reductions, as well as automation of inter-company transactions and settlements using smart contracts as major opportunities for the Korean won stablecoin through a SWOT analysis.
On the other hand, it identified risks such as the weakening of financial intermediation due to bank deposit outflows, the sale of reserve assets due to large-scale redemptions, and de-pegging from the face value. It also noted the possibility of a "coin run" where users demand large-scale redemptions in a short period if trust in stablecoins weakens.
Currently, the impact of stablecoins on traditional financial markets is limited, but it has been confirmed that interconnections could increase if market instability grows. Price fluctuations of Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC), Bitcoin (BTC), the won-dollar exchange rate, KOSPI, and government bond rates could influence each other. The inter-market impact significantly increased from February to early March when Bitcoin prices fell and the conflict between the U.S. and Iran escalated.
In particular, the influence between stablecoins and the foreign exchange market appeared to be relatively larger than the relationship with other financial markets. The report suggested that if the use of dollar-based stablecoins expands, it could act as an additional volatility factor in the financial market.
However, it also pointed out that the current payment and settlement functions of stablecoins are not yet generalized and that the analysis was focused on dollar-based stablecoins.
"Principle of 100% or More Reserve Assets... Consideration for Designating Important Stablecoins"
The National Assembly Budget Office proposed policy directions for the introduction of a Korean won stablecoin, including improvements to digital financial payment infrastructure, gradual regulatory improvements to secure monetary sovereignty, and the establishment of a stabilization system for the stablecoin market.
As a micro-stability measure, it suggested that, referencing the cases of the United States and the European Union (EU), regulations should be established to require reserve assets to be held at a minimum of 100% of the issuance amount, and detailed criteria for the composition of reserve assets such as cash and short-term government bonds should be developed.
If compensation for the use of stablecoins is allowed, it also recommended that measures be considered to regulate the upper limit of compensation rates and the scope of application, taking into account competition with the existing financial industry and the potential for excessive issuance.
At a macro level, it proposed designating stablecoins used above a certain level as "important stablecoins." Similar to the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), it would designate important tokens based on user numbers and transaction volumes, applying stricter capital and liquidity regulations than for general tokens.
The National Assembly Budget Office stated, "It is necessary to consider that important stablecoins could act as factors of instability in the financial market by influencing government bond rates, exchange rates, etc."
Additionally, it suggested that in preparation for the possibility of increased volatility between stablecoins and the financial market due to domestic and external economic shocks, it is necessary to carefully consider including important stablecoins in the market stabilization measures of financial and monetary authorities.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Bitcoin and Quantum Risk: This Study Shows Which Exchanges Are Most Exposed

BTC more affected by U.S. Treasury market than Fed policy

CoinShares: Bitcoin's Rise Depends on Financial Instability

Strategy's $150 million-a-day STRC market has a hidden dependency on its own buybacks

Did the US Government Sell Bitcoin? What the 12,267 BTC Transfer Shows and What On-Chain Data Cannot Prove
No sale has been confirmed. On October 8, 2026, US government-linked wallets moved 12,267 BTC, worth about $1.01 billion, out of a wallet holding funds seized in the 2016 Bitfinex hack, to new unlabeled addresses with no exchange deposit recorded. On-chain data shows movement, not intent, and no US agency has explained the transfers.

Why Bitcoin Could Drop Below $80,000 After Another Failed Bounce

Bitcoin Price Slips to a Three-Week Low Near $81,000: Can $80,000 Hold After Three Rejections at $87K?
The Bitcoin price briefly fell below $81,000 on October 9, 2026, its lowest level in nearly three weeks, after repeated failures near $87,000. A bond selloff, weaker tech stocks, spot ETF outflows and a long liquidation wave all added pressure. The $80,000 area is now the key support, while $83,000 is the first level bulls need to reclaim.

Crypto firms turn to Anthropic AI to find security flaws

Kruidvat sells Bitcoin gift cards with high fees

President Trump unveils $215M quantum computing plan amid crypto fears

Tiger Research: Five Key Changes in Crypto VC for Q3 2026

Midterm Elections in the United States, Bitcoin Could Benefit from a Historic Rise

Core Lightning v26.06.9 released with security fixes and payment bug repair

Long-Bond Highs Pressure Tech| WEEX TradFi Daily Brief (October 9, 2026)
Indexes were mixed on October 8 ET. The long-bond yield touched about 5.35% intraday, near levels last seen in 2002. OpenAI’s annualized revenue of about $50 billion came in below higher figures that had circulated, pressuring tech and chip names. Nasdaq fell clearly, while Dow edged higher. Energy led, with WTI up about 3.2% to about $91. Bitcoin pulled back from about $86,000 and traded near $81,000, down about 5%. September PPI is the focus on October 9.

WEEX Exclusive:Long-Bond Highs Pressure Tech| WEEX TradFi Daily Brief (October 9, 2026)
Indexes were mixed on October 8 ET. The long-bond yield touched about 5.35% intraday, near levels last seen in 2002. OpenAI’s annualized revenue of about $50 billion came in below higher figures that had circulated, pressuring tech and chip names. Nasdaq fell clearly, while Dow edged higher. Energy led, with WTI up about 3.2% to about $91. Bitcoin pulled back from about $86,000 and traded near $81,000, down about 5%. September PPI is the focus on October 9.

Ansem: Quantum Risks Will Drive ZEC Closer to BTC, Pure Meme Surpassing Bitcoin Is Highly Unlikely

Thailand SEC Allows Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs to Trade

Q3 Crypto Investment Review: Strategic Capital Rises, Seed Rounds Cool Off

AI may be keeping Bitcoin’s biggest macro headwind alive after the Fed stops hiking

Why Are AI Stocks Still Rising Despite Soaring US Treasury Yields?

Arthur Hayes Predicts a Super Bull Market for Digital Assets

Robin Linus Releases Bitcoin Poker Protocol with 56,000 Transaction Tree Nodes

Meanwhile Completes $37.5 Million Financing, Total Funding Exceeds $180 Million

OSL Launches USDGO Market-Neutral Fund On-Chain for Hong Kong Investors

Bitcoin Core merges privacy fix into v32, v31 patch remains open

PowerCompute Mines 8.1 Bitcoin In September, Reduces Debt By 22.45 Million

Strategy Schedules October 29 Bitcoin Treasury Update

BNY Expands Regulated Crypto Custody Across The European Union Under MiCA

Citrini Research predicts tokenization could surpass BTC and ETH

Bitcoin ETFs See $484.9 Million Outflows Led By BlackRock
Bitcoin and Quantum Risk: This Study Shows Which Exchanges Are Most Exposed
BTC more affected by U.S. Treasury market than Fed policy
CoinShares: Bitcoin's Rise Depends on Financial Instability
Strategy's $150 million-a-day STRC market has a hidden dependency on its own buybacks
Did the US Government Sell Bitcoin? What the 12,267 BTC Transfer Shows and What On-Chain Data Cannot Prove
No sale has been confirmed. On October 8, 2026, US government-linked wallets moved 12,267 BTC, worth about $1.01 billion, out of a wallet holding funds seized in the 2016 Bitfinex hack, to new unlabeled addresses with no exchange deposit recorded. On-chain data shows movement, not intent, and no US agency has explained the transfers.




